Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

WA SB 5956: Addressing artificial intelligence, student discipline, and surveillance in public schools.

Dead/Failed Washington

Last verified Oct 16, 2026 · official bill text

SB 5956 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 12, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Washington's SB 5956 (1st substitute, 2026 session) would have limited AI, automated decision systems (ADS) and surveillance technology in public school discipline. An ADS could not have been the sole or determinative basis for a discipline decision, districts could not have used ADS risk scores or watchlists predicting misconduct or violence, and biometric data could not have been used to infer emotions or other sensitive traits. It passed the Senate 35-13 on February 10, 2026 but was returned to Senate Rules on March 12 and died at adjournment.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have barred school districts and their vendors from using ADS as the sole basis for student discipline, risk scoring or watchlists.

Key provisions

  1. ADS may not be the sole or determinative basis for suspension, expulsion, emergency removal or other discipline decisions, and no student may be disciplined or referred to law enforcement based solely on an ADS score or surveillance data without independent human review (Sec. 3)
  2. Districts may not use an ADS as the sole or determinative basis for risk scores predicting misconduct, gang affiliation, criminal behavior or targeted violence, may not keep ADS-based watchlists, and may not contract with vendors that require those uses (Sec. 4)
  3. Districts may not use biometric data to infer emotional states, mental health, sexual orientation, gender identity or other sensitive traits; exceptions for voluntary employee access, narrow federal-law uses and educator professional development (Sec. 5)
  4. Student information from AI, ADS or surveillance tools could go to law enforcement only when required by law or to address an imminent likelihood of serious physical harm (Sec. 6)
  5. School districts may not use a facial recognition service for ongoing surveillance or tracking of students; the warrant, exigency and court-order exceptions that apply to other agencies do not apply (Sec. 8, RCW 43.386.080(8))
  6. OSPI to update its AI guidance; WSSDA to develop a model policy by February 1, 2027 (Secs. 9-10); rules apply to charter and tribal compact schools (Secs. 11-12)
  7. Passed Senate February 10, 2026 (35-13); House Education majority do pass with amendment(s) February 24; returned to Senate Rules March 12; died at adjournment. No effective date or penalty stated in the text

Latest legislative action

Mar 12, 2026. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 11)

NameRole
Primary
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor

Roll call votes

3rd Reading & Final Passage (#18) Feb 10, 2026

35 yea13 nay1 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error