Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN HF3893: Use of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy services regulated, and civil penalties provided.

Dead/Failed Minnesota · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HF3893 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 9, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Minnesota's HF 3893 (2nd engrossment) would have added Minn. Stat. 214.165, barring anyone from offering therapy or psychotherapy to the public unless a licensed professional conducts it, and barring licensed professionals from using AI to make independent therapeutic decisions, interact with clients therapeutically, generate unreviewed treatment plans or provide assessments. AI could do only administrative support. Licensing boards could fine up to $50,000 per violation. It was re-referred to Commerce Finance and Policy on April 7, 2026 and went no further.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations for therapists or AI mental health services in Minnesota.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 214.165; therapy or psychotherapy to the public only by a licensed professional; the attorney general could enforce against unlicensed persons and entities under section 8.31
  2. Licensed professionals could not use AI to make independent therapeutic decisions, directly interact with clients in therapeutic communication, generate treatment recommendations or plans without their review and approval, or provide psychological or psychosocial assessment
  3. AI allowed only for administrative or supplementary support (such as client records, billing and insurance claims, and logistical communications without therapeutic advice), with the professional keeping full responsibility
  4. A chatbot used for administrative support would have to say immediately that it is not a human and advise clients who raise mental health topics or self-harm to consult family, a friend or a licensed professional
  5. Ambient listening would require the client's written, informed consent with listed disclosures, including whether data trains a large language model and when it is destroyed
  6. Licensing boards could impose a civil penalty up to $50,000 per violation; hearing request within 30 days; payment due within 60 days
  7. Exempts religious counseling, peer support and public self-help or educational resources; effective the day following final enactment; companion SF 4280 (committee only)
  8. House: introduced March 2, 2026, 2nd engrossment re-referred to Commerce Finance and Policy April 7, 2026; author Virnig added April 9, 2026

Latest legislative action

Apr 9, 2026. Author added Virnig; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors (showing 5 of 25)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error