Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN HF560: Use of facial recognition technology as part of the driver's license and Minnesota identification card application process required.

Dead/Failed Minnesota · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HF560 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 13, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Minnesota's HF 560 would have required the commissioner of public safety to use facial recognition on every driver's license and Minnesota ID application or renewal to prevent multiple issuances and identification fraud, comparing applicants' faces with state, FBI and other law enforcement databases. A confirmed match would have blocked issuance and been referred to law enforcement. Introduced February 13, 2025 and never left committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations. It would have required the state to use facial recognition for licenses and IDs.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 171.0602 (Fraud detection; facial recognition); no companion listed
  2. Facial recognition software would compare applicants against Department of Public Safety records, relevant FBI records and other databases with law enforcement or criminal history information
  3. A department employee must review any possible match; a confirmed match bars issuance until invalidated and is referred to law enforcement, which re-evaluates it
  4. The text states no exceptions, privacy safeguards or retention limits
  5. Would have applied to applications and renewals on or after January 1, 2027
  6. Introduced February 13, 2025 and referred to Transportation Finance and Policy; no further action before the Legislature adjourned

Latest legislative action

Feb 13, 2025. Introduction and first reading, referred to Transportation Finance and Policy; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors (showing 5 of 18)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error