View full title
Provides that in any civil, criminal or family court proceeding, where evidence is offered and a party contends that such evidence has been fabricated by means of generative artificial intelligence, the court shall not, on that ground alone, conduct an inquiry into such alleged fabrication unless the party so contending makes a showing sufficient to support a reasonable inference that the evidence may not be authentic.
This bill restricts court inquiries into evidence authenticity based on AI fabrication claims unless a reasonable inference of inauthenticity is demonstrated.
If you present evidence in court that may involve AI, you must be prepared to substantiate claims of authenticity or face potential legal challenges.
What do these statuses mean? ▼
Affected Industries
Topics
What This Means
This bill establishes a standard for courts to follow when AI fabrication is alleged, requiring sufficient evidence before investigating authenticity, impacting legal proceedings with AI-generated materials.
Key Provisions
- Courts cannot inquire into evidence authenticity based solely on AI fabrication claims.
- A party must provide sufficient evidence to support claims of evidence fabrication.
- The bill applies to civil, criminal, and family court proceedings.
Latest Legislative Action
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
Compliance Checklist
Who: Legal practitioners and parties presenting evidence
Penalty: Potential legal challenges if claims are not substantiated
Full Legal Analysis
Full Analysis for Subscribers
Get the complete legal breakdown, compliance checklist, enforcement timeline, and expert commentary on S09390.
Unlock Full Analysis →Related Topics
Affected Industries
More New York AI Legislation
More New York AI Laws
Browse all AI bills and regulations tracked for New York.