NY S09390: Provides that in any civil, criminal or family court proceeding, where evidence is offered and a party contends that such evidence has been fabricate… Verified

The bill introduces a new rule across civil, criminal, and family court proceedings regarding the inquiry process for evidence claimed to be fabricated by generative artificial intelligence. It stipulates that a court shall not conduct an inquiry into such claims unless the contending party provides sufficient evidence to support a reasonable inference that the evidence may not be authentic. The bill applies uniformly across all types of court proceedings, ensuring that the same standards for evidence authenticity are maintained regardless of the legal context. This could affect a wide range of cases, from civil disputes to criminal prosecutions and family law matters, where AI-generated evidence might be presented. There are no specified penalties for non-compliance within the bill text, but the implications of failing to meet the authenticity standards could result in evidence being ruled inadmissible, which could significantly impact the outcomes of cases. The bill does not define 'generative artificial intelligence' specifically, but it clearly outlines the procedural requirements for challenging evidence based on claims of AI fabrication. This legislation is notable as it reflects a growing recognition of the complexities introduced by AI technologies in legal contexts. Similar legislative efforts may be observed in other jurisdictions as courts grapple with the implications of AI-generated content and its reliability as evidence.