Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

PA HB594: Further providing for definitions; providing for use of automated employment decision tool; and further providing for civil penalties.

In Committee Pennsylvania · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 22, 2026 · official bill text

HB594 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Pennsylvania's HB 594 (2025-26) would amend the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to require an employer or employment agency using an automated employment decision tool to notify and get consent from individuals before the interview and to use only tools with a bias audit from within the past year, with the results summary posted online. It was referred to the House Labor & Industry Committee on February 12, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, employers and employment agencies using automated hiring tools would have to give notice, get consent, use only tools bias-audited within the prior year and post audit summaries.

Key provisions

  1. Would require notice at least ten days before the interview that an automated employment decision tool may be used, and an explanation of how it works and what general types of characteristics it uses
  2. Would require the individual's consent before the interview and bar using the tool on individuals who have not consented
  3. Would bar using the tool for an employment decision unless it had a bias audit by an independent auditor no more than one year earlier, with a summary of the latest results on the employer's or agency's public website
  4. Would define an automated employment decision tool as a statistical or learning-based system that automatically filters individuals for employment or terms and conditions of employment
  5. Would let the Human Relations Commission set civil penalties of not more than $500 for a first violation and $500 to $1,500 for each later violation
  6. Would take effect in 60 days
  7. Referred to the House Labor & Industry Committee on February 12, 2025

Latest legislative action

Feb 12, 2025. Referred to Labor & Industry

Sponsors (showing 5 of 76)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
D Primary
Cosponsor

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error