Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

VA HB2692: No fake or AI-made documents in juvenile interrogations

Official title: Custodial interrogations; false statements to a child prohibited, inauthentic replica documents.

Effective Jul 1, 2025 Virginia · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 1, 2026 · official bill text

HB2692 · where it stands

All steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Since Jul 1, 2025
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Virginia's HB 2692 amends Code § 16.1-247.1 to bar law-enforcement officers from knowingly and intentionally making false statements about known material facts, including by using inauthentic replica documents, before or during a custodial interrogation of a child to secure the child's cooperation, confession or conviction. Inauthentic replica documents include computer-generated documents created by any means, including AI. If an officer knowingly violates the rule, the child's statements are inadmissible in a delinquency or criminal proceeding against the child unless the prosecution proves they were made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. Chapter 669; effective July 1, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses; it governs police interrogations of children. Statements obtained with false statements or fake documents, including AI-generated ones, can be ruled inadmissible against the child if the officer knowingly broke the rule.

Key provisions

  1. Amends Code § 16.1-247.1 (custodial interrogation of a child)
  2. Officers may not knowingly and intentionally make false statements about any known material fact, including by use of inauthentic replica documents, before or during a custodial interrogation of a child to secure the child's cooperation, confession or conviction
  3. Inauthentic replica documents: documents, including computer-generated documents created by any means including artificial intelligence, made by an officer or agent that contain a false statement, signature, seal, letterhead or contact information or materially misrepresent a fact
  4. If an officer knowingly violates this rule or the parent-notification rule, the child's statements are inadmissible in a delinquency or criminal proceeding against the child unless the Commonwealth proves by a preponderance of the evidence they were made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
  5. Enacted April 2, 2025 after the General Assembly adopted the Governor's recommendation (Chapter 669); effective July 1, 2025

Latest legislative action

Apr 2, 2025. Enacted, Chapter 669 (Effective 07/01/25)

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-089
D Sponsor HD-095
D Sponsor HD-079
D Sponsor HD-079

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 9)

H House concurred in Governor's recommendation (72-Y 23-N) Apr 2, 2025

72 yea23 nay5 otherPassed

S Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (27-Y 12-N) Apr 2, 2025

27 yea12 nay1 otherPassed

H Senate Amendment agreed to by House (51-Y 46-N) Feb 19, 2025

51 yea46 nay3 otherPassed

Amendments (4)

  • HCJ Sub: Criminal Amendments Not adopted
  • Courts of Justice Amendment Not adopted
  • Courts of Justice Amendment Not adopted
  • Senate Amendment Not adopted

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error