Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
The bill prohibits law enforcement from using false statements or inauthentic documents during child interrogations, making resulting statements inadmissible.
Virginia's HB2692 aims to protect children during custodial interrogations by prohibiting law enforcement from using false statements or inauthentic documents. This bill highlights the potential misuse of AI-generated materials in legal settings, ensuring that any statements made by children under such circumstances are inadmissible in court.
Key Provisions
Prohibits law enforcement from making false statements during child interrogations.
Defines 'inauthentic replica documents' to include AI-generated content.
Declares statements made by children inadmissible if obtained through prohibited practices.
Latest Legislative Action
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0669)
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Jackie GlassD
Sponsor
HD-089
Marcia PriceD
Sponsor
HD-095
Nadarius ClarkD
Sponsor
HD-079
Rae CousinsD
Sponsor
HD-079
Roll Call Votes (showing 3 of 9)
H ·
House concurred in Governor's recommendation (72-Y 23-N) ·
Apr 2, 2025
72 Yea 23 Nay 5 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (27-Y 12-N) ·
Apr 2, 2025
27 Yea 12 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
H ·
Senate Amendment agreed to by House (51-Y 46-N) ·
Feb 19, 2025
51 Yea 46 Nay 3 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Passed Senate with amendment (22-Y 18-N) ·
Feb 18, 2025
22 Yea 18 NayPassed ✓
S ·
Constitutional reading dispensed (on 2nd reading) (36-Y 0-N) ·
Feb 14, 2025
36 Yea 0 Nay 4 OtherPassed ✓
S ·
Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment (10-Y 5-N) ·
Feb 12, 2025
10 Yea 5 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Read third time and passed House (51-Y 48-N) ·
Feb 4, 2025
51 Yea 48 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
H ·
Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment(s) (13-Y 9-N) ·
Jan 29, 2025
13 Yea 9 NayPassed ✓
H ·
Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (5-Y 3-N) ·
Jan 24, 2025
5 Yea 3 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
Amendments (4)
HCJ Sub: Criminal AmendmentsPending—
Courts of Justice AmendmentPending—
Courts of Justice AmendmentPending—
Senate AmendmentPending—
Compliance Checklist
Ensure no false statements are made during child interrogations Who: Law enforcement officers Penalty: Statements made by children will be inadmissible in court
Avoid using inauthentic documents in interrogations Who: Law enforcement agencies Penalty: Statements made by children will be inadmissible in court
Full Legal Analysis
HB2692 establishes clear prohibitions on law enforcement officers regarding the use of false statements and inauthentic replica documents during custodial interrogations of children. Specifically, the bill mandates that officers cannot knowingly make false statements or utilize documents that misrepresent material facts to secure a confession or cooperation from a child. If a law enforcement officer violates this prohibition, any statements made by the child during the interrogation will be deemed inadmissible in delinquency or criminal proceedings. The bill applies to law enforcement officers and their agents, emphasizing the importance of integrity in interactions with minors. While the effective date is not specified in the provided metadata, the penalties for non-compliance are significant, as any statements obtained under such circumstances cannot be used in court, potentially undermining cases against minors. Key definitions include 'inauthentic replica documents,' which are described as documents containing false information, including those generated by artificial intelligence. This aspect of the bill highlights the growing intersection of technology and law enforcement practices, particularly concerning the reliability of AI-generated content. Similar laws in other states may not specifically address the use of AI in this context, making Virginia's approach noteworthy in the realm of child protection and interrogation practices.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.