Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

VA HB669: Impersonation of certain licensed professionals by chatbot; definitions, notice, civil liability.

Dead/Failed Virginia · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB669 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 18, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Virginia's HB 669 (2026 Regular Session) would have barred chatbots from acting as licensed professionals. As introduced, a chatbot proprietor could not let a chatbot give responses or take actions that would be the unlicensed practice of fields such as medicine, nursing, dentistry, psychology or law. It failed: left in House Appropriations Committee on February 18, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have restricted companies that deploy chatbots from presenting them as licensed professionals.

Key provisions

  1. As introduced, a proprietor could not permit a chatbot to give substantive responses or advice, or take actions, that would be the unlicensed practice of listed professions if done by a person
  2. The listed professions include architecture, engineering, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, social work, veterinary medicine and law, plus licensure rules for public school teachers and officers
  3. Committee substitute (Feb. 9, 2026) proposed Code 54.1-111.1: a deployer could not make publicly available a dedicated AI system with listed features, including falsely representing that it is a licensed professional and giving individualized professional diagnosis, treatment or advice that would be a crime under Code 54.1-111 if given by an unlicensed person
  4. The substitute's section title covers notice, enforcement and civil penalties
  5. Status: reported from committee with substitute 20-Y 1-N 1-A on Feb. 9, 2026; left in Appropriations Committee on February 18, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 18, 2026. Left in Committee Appropriations

Sponsors (showing 5 of 22)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
D Primary
R Primary

Roll call votes

Subcommittee recommends laying on the table Feb 11, 2026

5 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

Reported from Communications, Technology and Innovation with substitute Feb 9, 2026

20 yea1 nay1 otherPassed

Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute Feb 9, 2026

9 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error