Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

AK HB306: Ai, Deepfakes, Cybersecurity, Data Xfers

Dead/Failed Alaska · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

HB306 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 19, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Alaska's HB 306 would have required a statement ('This communication has been manipulated or generated by artificial intelligence') on campaign communications containing a deepfake meant to injure a candidate or party or deceive voters. It would also have set rules for state agency AI used for consequential decisions: inventories, impact assessments, notice, consent, appeals and bans. It was heard and held in House State Affairs March 19, 2024 and died when the 33rd Legislature ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have covered people publishing campaign deepfakes and vendors selling decision-making AI to Alaska state agencies.

Key provisions

  1. AS 15.13.093: anyone who knows or should know a communication includes a deepfake depicting a candidate or party, made to injure reputation or deceive a voter, would have to include the AI statement, read aloud in audio and kept on screen in digital video
  2. The Department of Administration would inventory state agency AI systems used for consequential decisions every two years and publish the inventories; agencies would assess impact at least every two years
  3. Agencies using such systems would have to notify affected individuals, get consent before collecting sensitive personal data, provide an appeal with manual human review, and get consent for AI in video interviews of job applicants
  4. Agencies could not use such systems involving biometric identification (including facial recognition), emotion recognition, cognitive behavioral manipulation or social scoring, or data hosted in China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia or Venezuela
  5. State agencies could contract for such systems only with vendors using multi-factor authentication, and could not transfer data about an individual to another agency without consent unless required by law
  6. Individuals harmed could sue the state or a state employee for damages, punitive damages and attorney fees

Latest legislative action

Mar 19, 2024. (H) Heard & Held

Sponsors (showing 5 of 7)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error