Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB0035: AI USE IN HEALTH INSURANCE ACT

Passed One Chamber Illinois · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 14, 2026 · official bill text

HB0035 · where it stands

2 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 35 (engrossed, with House Floor Amendment 1) would create the Artificial Intelligence Systems Use in Health Insurance Act. A health insurance issuer could not issue an adverse consumer outcome denying, reducing or terminating coverage or benefits that results solely from an AI system or predictive model, and denials, reductions or terminations resulting from AI would need meaningful review by a person able to override the AI. The Department of Insurance could review issuers' AI use. Passed the House 79-35 on April 9, 2025; re-referred to Senate Assignments June 2, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, health insurers, HMOs and similar issuers could not deny or cut coverage solely on AI output and would need human review.

Key provisions

  1. A health insurance issuer authorized in Illinois would not issue an adverse consumer outcome denying, reducing or terminating health coverage or benefits that results solely from the use of an AI system or predictive model
  2. Decision-making on denials, reductions or terminations that results from AI systems or predictive models would be meaningfully reviewed, under Department rules, by an individual with authority to override the AI systems
  3. For adverse determinations regulated by the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act, that reviewer would be a clinical peer as defined in that Act
  4. In an investigation or market conduct action, the Department of Insurance could review issuers' development, implementation and use of AI systems and predictive models and request documentation on AI governance, risk management, third-party diligence and AI systems program compliance; issuers would have to comply
  5. The Department could adopt rules on full and fair disclosure of issuers' AI use, including notice before use, notice after an adverse decision, how personal information is used, correcting inaccurate information and appeals
  6. Issuers would have to comply with the Act and other insurance laws, and their AI systems programs would have to ensure conformity; health service plan corporations under the Voluntary Health Services Plans Act would also be subject to it
  7. Status: passed the House 79-35-0 on April 9, 2025; in the Senate, Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 was filed May 12, 2025 and on June 2, 2025 the bill was re-referred to Assignments; not enacted

Latest legislative action

Jun 2, 2025. Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments

Sponsors (showing 5 of 65)

NameRole
D Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary
D Primary

Roll call votes

Third Reading Apr 9, 2025

79 yea35 nay4 otherPassed

Insurance, Amendment 1 Apr 8, 2025

10 yea4 nay3 otherPassed

Insurance Mar 11, 2025

11 yea6 nayPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error