Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB5116: AUTOMATED DECISION TOOLS

Dead/Failed Illinois · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB5116 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 7, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 5116 (103rd General Assembly) would have created the Automated Decision Tools Act. On or before January 1, 2026, and annually after, a deployer of an automated decision tool would have to perform an impact assessment, notify people subject to a consequential decision, and keep a governance program to manage algorithmic discrimination risk. The Attorney General could sue. Died at Session Sine Die on January 7, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required deployers of automated decision tools to assess, notify, run a governance program and send assessments to the Department of Human Rights.

Key provisions

  1. An "automated decision tool" would be an AI-based system developed and marketed, or modified, to make or be a controlling factor in making consequential decisions (such as employment, education, housing, utilities, healthcare, and financial services)
  2. On or before January 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, a deployer would have to perform an impact assessment for each tool it uses or designs, codes or produces
  3. At or before use to make a consequential decision, a deployer would have to notify the natural person subject to it that the tool is being used to make, or is a controlling factor in, the decision, and provide specified information
  4. A deployer would have to establish, document, implement and maintain a governance program with reasonable administrative and technical safeguards against reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination
  5. Within 60 days after completing an impact assessment, a deployer would have to provide it to the Department of Human Rights
  6. The Attorney General could bring a civil action against a deployer for a violation
  7. Introduced February 8, 2024 and referred to Rules Committee; no further action before Session Sine Die January 7, 2025

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2025. Session Sine Die

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-059

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error