Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NJ S3732: Prohibits certain businesses from using dynamic, surveillance, or personalized algorithmic pricing when selling groceries to consumers.

In Committee New Jersey

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

S3732 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

New Jersey's S 3732 would make it an unlawful practice under the Consumer Fraud Act for a retail food store or third-party grocery delivery platform to use dynamic pricing, surveillance pricing or personalized algorithmic pricing when selling groceries, in person or online. Discounts and loyalty benefits based on past purchases would still be allowed. Introduced March 5, 2026 and referred to the Senate Commerce Committee; it has not passed either house.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, grocery retailers and grocery delivery platforms could not use these algorithmic or surveillance pricing methods.

Key provisions

  1. Would define dynamic pricing as pricing that fluctuates where algorithmic or AI models retrain or recalibrate in near real time, excluding promotions, loyalty benefits and temporary discounts.
  2. Would define surveillance pricing as customized prices based in whole or part on information collected through electronic surveillance technology (sensors, cameras, device tracking, biometric monitoring and similar).
  3. Would make using dynamic, surveillance or personalized algorithmic pricing on groceries by a retail food store or third-party grocery delivery platform an unlawful practice under P.L.1960, c.39.
  4. Would not limit discounts, promotional prices or loyalty benefits offered based on previous purchase history.
  5. The sponsor's statement says consumer fraud act penalties are up to $10,000 for a first offense and $20,000 for later ones; penalties from this bill would go to a Grocery Pricing Fairness Fund for community food pantries.
  6. The Director of Consumer Affairs would adopt implementing rules; the act would take effect on the first day of the seventh month after enactment.
  7. Status: introduced March 5, 2026 and referred to the Senate Commerce Committee; not passed by either house.

Latest legislative action

Mar 5, 2026. Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Commerce Committee

Sponsors (showing 5 of 37)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error