Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY S09132: Prohibits the use of a wage-fixing algorithm in combination with personal or behavioral data to set or recommend wages or compensation; defines terms…

In Committee New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

S09132 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Prohibits the use of a wage-fixing algorithm in combination with personal or behavioral data to set or recommend wages or compensation; defines terms; establishes penalties for violations of such prohibition.

In one paragraph

New York's S 9132 would add Labor Law § 194-c barring an employer from using a wage-fixing algorithm, or its output, combined with personal or behavioral data to set or recommend wages or compensation, whether the data is collected by the employer or a third party. The Attorney General or a harmed worker could sue for the greater of actual damages or $3,000 per violation, with treble damages for willful or egregious violations. Referred to the Labor Committee February 5, 2026; it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, employers could not use algorithmic pay-setting tools fed personal or behavioral data and would face Attorney General and worker lawsuits.

Key provisions

  1. Employers may not use a wage-fixing algorithm or its output with personal or behavioral data to set or recommend wages or compensation
  2. Tools whose inputs are limited to job requirements, performance (not customer reviews), qualifications, labor market conditions or local cost of living are excluded from the definition
  3. Attorney General may enforce by civil action for the greater of actual damages or $3,000, treble damages for willful or egregious violations, disgorgement of profits, attorneys' fees and costs, and other relief
  4. Labor Commissioner may issue rules and enforce under Labor Law § 218; any harmed individual or group may sue for an injunction and the same money relief except disgorgement
  5. Workers alleging a violation are protected from retaliation under § 215; employer must show by a preponderance of the evidence that pay differences were due only to lawful factors
  6. Takes effect on the thirtieth day after becoming law; Assembly same-as A9638

Latest legislative action

Feb 5, 2026. REFERRED TO LABOR

Sponsors

NameRole
D Primary
Primary
D Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error