Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OR HB4085: Relating to autonomous vehicles.

Dead/Failed Oregon · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB4085 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 6, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Oregon HB 4085 (2026) would have let autonomous vehicles run on Oregon highways with the driving system engaged if they can reach a minimal risk condition or request intervention, follow state vehicle law and meet federal safety standards. It would have required at least $1 million per occurrence third-party liability coverage, state authorization for driverless for-hire service and local preemption. It had a public hearing in the House Transportation committee and was in committee upon adjournment March 6, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have bound autonomous vehicle operators and on-demand AV networks in Oregon.

Key provisions

  1. A person could operate an autonomous vehicle with the automated driving system engaged if it can reach a minimal risk condition or request to intervene, can follow state vehicle law, and meets federal motor vehicle safety standards (Sec. 4)
  2. The driving system would be treated as the driver; the onboard operator or owner stays liable for traffic violations (Sec. 5)
  3. Operators would need required liability insurance plus at least $1 million combined single limit per-occurrence third-party liability coverage when the system is engaged (Sec. 8)
  4. Driverless for-hire operation would need Department of Transportation authorization and a first responder interaction plan; authorization would not expire unless suspended or revoked (Secs. 10, 12)
  5. Local governments could not ban, tax or add AV-specific requirements, and on-demand AV networks would be exempt from ORS chapter 825 motor carrier rules (Secs. 11, 13)
  6. Referred to Transportation; public hearing February 9, 2026; in committee upon adjournment March 6, 2026; not enacted; no effective date stated in the text

Latest legislative action

Mar 6, 2026. In committee upon adjournment.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 40)

NameRole
Primary
R Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error