MI HB5579: Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Cre…
Reviewed
Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.
AI Summary
HB5579 restricts employer use of electronic monitoring and automated decision tools, allowing exceptions for specific purposes.
Michigan's HB5579 limits employer use of electronic monitoring and automated decision tools, with exceptions for tasks like job application screening and performance assessment.
Key Provisions
Sec. 4: Restrictions on automated decision tools with exceptions for job application screening.
Sec. 5: Permitted uses of electronic monitoring tools and requirements for notice and consent.
Sec. 9: Requirement for impact assessments of tools to evaluate biases and compliance.
Latest Legislative Action
Bill Electronically Reproduced 02/24/2026
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 68)
Name
Role
Laurie PohutskyD
Primary
Penelope TsernoglouD
Primary
Will SnyderD
Primary
94
Cosponsor
Abraham Aiyash
Cosponsor
Alabas FarhatD
Cosponsor
Amos O'NealD
Cosponsor
Betsy CoffiaD
Cosponsor
Bradley Slagh
Cosponsor
Brenda CarterD
Cosponsor
Carol GlanvilleD
Cosponsor
Carrie RheingansD
Cosponsor
Christine Morse
Cosponsor
Cynthia NeeleyD
Cosponsor
Denise MentzerD
Cosponsor
Donavan McKinneyD
Cosponsor
Dylan WegelaD
Cosponsor
Emily DievendorfD
Cosponsor
Erin ByrnesD
Cosponsor
Felicia Brabec
Cosponsor
Graham Filler
Cosponsor
Helena ScottD
Cosponsor
Helena\r\n Scott
Cosponsor
Jason HoskinsD
Cosponsor
Jason MorganD
Cosponsor
Jasper Martus
Cosponsor
Jennifer ConlinD
Cosponsor
Jimmie WilsonD
Cosponsor
Joey AndrewsD
Cosponsor
John FitzgeraldD
Cosponsor
Joseph Tate
Cosponsor
Julie BrixieD
Cosponsor
Julie RogersD
Cosponsor
Kara HopeD
Cosponsor
Karen WhitsettD
Cosponsor
Kelly BreenD
Cosponsor
Kimberly EdwardsD
Cosponsor
Kristian GrantD
Cosponsor
Lori Stone
Cosponsor
Mai XiongD
Cosponsor
Mary CavanaghD
Cosponsor
Matt KoleszarD
Cosponsor
Matt LongjohnD
Cosponsor
Mike McFallD
Cosponsor
Morgan ForemanD
Cosponsor
Natalie PriceD
Cosponsor
Noah ArbitD
Cosponsor
Padma Kuppa
Cosponsor
Peter HerzbergD
Cosponsor
Phil SkaggsD
Cosponsor
Rachel Hood
Cosponsor
Reggie MillerD
Cosponsor
Regina WeissD
Cosponsor
Ronnie Peterson
Cosponsor
Samantha SteckloffD
Cosponsor
Samantha\r\n Steckloff
Cosponsor
Sharon MacDonellD
Cosponsor
Shri Thanedar
Cosponsor
Stephanie YoungD
Cosponsor
Stephen WoodenD
Cosponsor
Steven Johnson
Cosponsor
Tenisha Yancey
Cosponsor
Tim KellyR
Cosponsor
Tonya PhillipsD
Cosponsor
Tullio LiberatiD
Cosponsor
Tyrone CarterD
Cosponsor
Veronica PaizD
Cosponsor
William Sowerby
Cosponsor
Compliance Checklist
Conduct an impact assessment of automated decision-making tools Who: Employers Deadline: 1 year before implementation or within 6 months for existing tools Penalty: Civil sanctions for non-compliance
Provide written notice and obtain consent from covered individuals Who: Employers Deadline: Before using any monitoring tools Penalty: Civil sanctions for non-compliance
Full Legal Analysis
House Bill 5579, introduced in Michigan, establishes restrictions on the use of electronic monitoring and automated decision tools by employers. The bill permits the use of automated decision tools to screen large volumes of job applications to identify candidates meeting specific criteria or to assess job skills (Sec. 4). Electronic monitoring tools may be used for purposes such as facilitating essential job functions, monitoring production quality, assessing performance, ensuring legal compliance, and protecting health and safety (Sec. 5). Employers must provide written notice and obtain consent from individuals subject to these tools, ensure data accuracy, and allow data correction (Sec. 5). The bill prohibits data collection on off-duty employees and restricts the collection of sensitive data, including health and personal information (Sec. 5). Employers must conduct impact assessments of these tools to evaluate potential biases and compliance with anti-discrimination laws (Sec. 9). The bill mandates data retention limits and prohibits data sale or sharing, except under specific legal circumstances (Sec. 7).
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.