Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
Illinois HB4330 amends the Biometric Information Privacy Act to restrict the collection of biometric data by private entities. It allows exceptions for employers conducting background checks and certain sectors like medical services and law enforcement. Businesses must navigate these regulations carefully to avoid penalties.
Key Provisions
Private entities cannot require biometric data for goods/services, with exceptions for employers.
Exemptions apply to medical services, law enforcement, and governmental entities.
Entities must develop a public policy for retention and destruction of biometric data.
Latest Legislative Action
Session Sine Die
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
District
Sam YinglingD
Sponsor
HD-062
Compliance Checklist
Develop a written policy for biometric data retention and destruction Who: Private entities collecting biometric data Penalty: Potential legal consequences for non-compliance
Ensure consent is obtained before collecting biometric data Who: Private entities collecting biometric data Penalty: Potential legal consequences for non-compliance
Illinois HB4330 amends the Biometric Information Privacy Act, establishing that private entities cannot require biometric identifiers or information from individuals as a condition for goods or services, except for employers conducting background checks or implementing security protocols. The bill specifically exempts medical service providers, law enforcement agencies, and governmental entities from these restrictions. Compliance is crucial for businesses that handle biometric data, as failure to adhere to the new provisions could result in legal consequences. The bill aligns with growing concerns over data privacy and the ethical use of biometric information, reflecting similar legislative trends in other states that seek to protect individuals' biometric data from misuse.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.