AI compliance plan
Your AI compliance plan.
50 duties from 13 enacted laws in 1 state. Each one says who it falls on, when it starts and where in the law it comes from. The next start date is January 1, 2027.
The plan at a glance
50duties from 13 laws
7start in the next 90 days; the next on January 1, 2027
2laws let people sue over a violation
0laws give a set number of days to fix a violation before enforcement
Download CSV and calendar with Pro
Open as a checklist
Pro turns this plan into a spreadsheet for audit files and a calendar of every start date. The plan on this page stays open to everyone.
Already in effect 27 duties
These duties are in force today.
| Starts | Law | Who | What it requires | How often | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2020 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Notify each applicant, before the interview, that artificial intelligence may be used to analyze the video interview and consider the applicant's fitness for the position.Applies when: Before asking applicants to submit video interviews for a position based in Illinois that will be analyzed with AI. | Ongoing | 820 ILCS 42/5(1) |
| January 1, 2020 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Give each applicant, before the interview, information explaining how the artificial intelligence works and what general types of characteristics it uses to evaluate applicants.Applies when: Before asking applicants to submit video interviews for a position based in Illinois that will be analyzed with AI. | Ongoing | 820 ILCS 42/5(2) |
| January 1, 2020 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Obtain each applicant's consent, before the interview, to be evaluated by the AI program; do not use AI to evaluate applicants who have not consented.Applies when: Before asking applicants to submit video interviews for a position based in Illinois that will be analyzed with AI. | Ongoing | 820 ILCS 42/5(3) and closing sentence |
| January 1, 2020 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Do not share applicant videos, except with persons whose expertise or technology is necessary to evaluate an applicant's fitness for a position.Applies when: The employer holds applicant video interviews. | Ongoing | 820 ILCS 42/10 |
| January 1, 2022 | Illinois AI video interview demographic reporting (Section 20 of the Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act) | Employer | Collect the race and ethnicity of applicants who are and are not given an in-person interview after the AI analysis, and of applicants who are hired.Applies when: The employer relies solely on an AI analysis of a video interview to decide whether an applicant is selected for an in-person interview. | Ongoing | 820 ILCS 42/20(a)(1), (2) |
| January 1, 2022 | Illinois AI video interview demographic reporting (Section 20 of the Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act) | Employer | Report the collected demographic data to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity each year by December 31, covering the 12 months ending the preceding November 30.Applies when: The employer is covered by Section 20(a). The text does not state when the first report is due. | Every year | 820 ILCS 42/20(b) |
| January 1, 2022 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Collect the race and ethnicity of applicants who are and are not given an in-person interview after AI analysis, and of those hired, and report it yearly by December 31.Applies when: The employer relies solely on an AI analysis of a video interview to decide whether an applicant gets an in-person interview. The report goes to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity and covers the 12 months ending November 30. | Every year | 820 ILCS 42/20(a), (b) (added by P.A. 102-0047) |
| January 1, 2024 | Illinois civil remedy for sharing digitally altered sexual images (HB 2123) | Person | Do not share, or threaten to share, an intentionally digitally altered sexual image of an identifiable person without consent.Applies when: The sharer knew or recklessly disregarded that the person did not consent, that the image was altered, and that the person was identifiable. Labeling the image as altered is no defense. | Ongoing | 740 ILCS 190/10(a), (c) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois Health Care Protection Act, utilization review provision (HB 5395) | Utilization review program | Only a clinical peer may make adverse medical-necessity determinations; an accredited algorithmic automated process may only certify necessity or refer cases to a clinical peer.Applies when: Any utilization review for medical necessity. | Ongoing | 215 ILCS 134/85(e)(2) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875) | Person | Do not knowingly distribute, transmit or make available to the general public a sound recording or audiovisual work that you actually know contains an unauthorized digital replica.Applies when: Acts on or after January 1, 2025; the Section 35(c) exemptions apply. | Ongoing | 765 ILCS 1075/30(b) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875) | Person | Do not materially contribute to, induce or otherwise facilitate another party's Section 30(b) violation after obtaining actual knowledge that the other party is infringing.Applies when: After the person obtains actual knowledge of the other party's infringement; hosts that meet Section 30(e) are outside this rule. | Ongoing | 765 ILCS 1075/30(d), (e) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875) | Person | Do not use a deceased individual's identity or digital replica for commercial purposes for 50 years after death without prior written consent of the persons specified in Section 20.Applies when: The individual died after the Right of Publicity Act's effective date; the Section 35(c) exemptions apply. | Ongoing | 765 ILCS 1075/30(c) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois crimes for AI-generated child sexual imagery and sexually explicit digitized depictions (HB 4623) | Person | Do not knowingly receive, access, reproduce, share, exhibit or possess to share an obscene depiction of a purported child, including computer-generated images.Applies when: The depiction shows someone indistinguishable from an actual child under 18. | Ongoing | 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(b) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois crimes for AI-generated child sexual imagery and sexually explicit digitized depictions (HB 4623) | Person | Do not intentionally share a sexually explicit digitized depiction of an identifiable person who has not consented.Applies when: The sharer knows or should have known the person did not consent. The person is identifiable from the image, linked information, or is known to the sharer. | Ongoing | 720 ILCS 5/11-23.7(b) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois utilization review automated process law (HB 2472) | Utilization review program | Only a clinical peer may make an adverse medical-necessity determination or review its appeal, even when an algorithmic automated process is used.Applies when: Any utilization review for medical necessity. An accredited automated process may certify necessity or refer a case to a clinical peer. | Ongoing | 215 ILCS 134/45(i); 134/85(e)(2) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois utilization review automated process law (HB 2472) | Utilization review program | Use objective, evidence-based criteria meeting URAC or NCQA standards, and file proof of compliance with each registration and renewal.Applies when: Programs that use algorithmic automated processes to decide whether to make adverse medical-necessity determinations. Registration is every two years. | Ongoing | 215 ILCS 134/85(a), (b-10) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois utilization review automated process law (HB 2472) | Utilization review program | File policies ensuring board-certified licensed physicians set all criteria the automated process uses.Applies when: With registration materials, for programs using algorithmic automated processes. | Ongoing | 215 ILCS 134/85(b-10)(1) |
| January 1, 2025 | Illinois utilization review automated process law (HB 2472) | Utilization review program | Keep a program integrity system in which board-certified physicians verify the automated process and any corrections give results consistent with the criteria.Applies when: Before new or revised criteria are used, and when implementation errors are found after they take effect. | Ongoing | 215 ILCS 134/85(b-10)(2) |
| August 1, 2025 | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Individual, corporation, or entity | Do not provide, advertise or otherwise offer therapy or psychotherapy services to the public in Illinois, including through Internet-based AI, unless a licensed professional conducts the services.Applies when: Any offer of therapy or psychotherapy services to the public in Illinois. | Ongoing | P.A. 104-0054 § 20(a) (225 ILCS 155/20(a)) |
| August 1, 2025 | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Licensed professional | Use AI only for administrative or supplementary support, and keep full responsibility for all interactions, outputs and data use associated with the system.Applies when: A licensed professional uses AI tools or systems in therapy or psychotherapy services. | Ongoing | P.A. 104-0054 §§ 15(a), 20(b) |
| August 1, 2025 | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Licensed professional | Do not allow AI to make independent therapeutic decisions, directly interact with clients in therapeutic communication, generate unreviewed recommendations or treatment plans, or detect emotions or mental states.Applies when: Any use of AI by a licensed professional. Recommendations and treatment plans may be AI-generated only with the licensed professional's review and approval. | Ongoing | P.A. 104-0054 § 20(b)(1)-(4) |
| August 1, 2025 | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Licensed professional | Keep records and communications with individuals seeking therapy or psychotherapy services confidential; disclose only as the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act requires.Applies when: All records kept by a licensed professional and all communications with an individual seeking services. | Ongoing | P.A. 104-0054 § 25 |
| January 1, 2026 | Illinois Human Rights Act AI-in-employment amendment (Public Act 103-0804) | Employer | Do not use AI that has the effect of discriminating against employees on a protected basis in recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal, training selection, discharge, discipline, tenure or employment terms.Applies when: Any use of AI for the listed employment purposes, on and after January 1, 2026. | Ongoing | 775 ILCS 5/2-102(L)(1) |
| January 1, 2026 | Illinois Human Rights Act AI-in-employment amendment (Public Act 103-0804) | Employer | Do not use zip codes as a proxy for protected classes.Applies when: Any use of AI for the listed employment purposes, on and after January 1, 2026. | Ongoing | 775 ILCS 5/2-102(L)(1) |
| January 1, 2026 | Illinois Human Rights Act AI-in-employment amendment (Public Act 103-0804) | Employer | Notify employees that the employer is using AI for the listed employment purposes; failing to notify is a civil rights violation.Applies when: When AI is used for recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal, training selection, discharge, discipline, tenure or terms of employment, on and after January 1, 2026. Timing and means are left to Department rules. | Ongoing | 775 ILCS 5/2-102(L)(2) |
| January 1, 2026 | Illinois digital replica contract law (HB 3178) | Party contracting for an individual's services | Include a reasonably specific description of the digital replica's intended uses, or the provision is unenforceable for new performances.Applies when: The provision lets a digital replica replace in-person work and the individual had neither negotiating counsel nor a union agreement covering replicas. | Ongoing | 815 ILCS 550/10(a) |
| July 31, 2026 | Illinois AI smart glasses while driving (HB 4843) | Driver | Do not use AI smart glasses while driving on a roadway, even hands-free, voice-operated or when stopped in traffic, unless another listed exemption applies.Applies when: Whenever operating a motor vehicle on an Illinois roadway. | Ongoing | 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(a), (b), (d)(3), (d)(6) |
Starting in the next 90 days 7 duties
Time to prepare is short for these.
| Starts | Law | Who | What it requires | How often | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Frontier developer | Publish a transparency report giving its website, a contact mechanism, release date, supported languages, output modalities, intended uses and generally applicable use restrictions.Applies when: Before or at the same time as deploying a new or substantially modified frontier model. Subsection (c) states no separate start date. Publishing the information in a system card or model card counts. | Each time it happens | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(c)(1), (4); Section 99 |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Add to each transparency report machine-readable summaries of catastrophic risk assessments, their results, third-party evaluator involvement and other steps taken under the framework.Applies when: Before or at the same time as deploying a new or substantially modified frontier model. | Each time it happens | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(c)(2), (3) |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Send the Agency a summary of catastrophic risk assessments from internal use of its frontier models every 3 months.Applies when: Internal use of frontier models. Another schedule may be used if communicated in writing and agreed with the Agency. | Ongoing | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(e) |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Frontier developer | Make no materially false or misleading statement about catastrophic risk from its frontier models or its management of that risk.Applies when: Any statement. A large frontier developer also may not make such statements about implementing or complying with its framework. Good-faith statements reasonable under the circumstances are not violations. | Ongoing | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(f) |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Keep a current disclosure statement on file with the Agency and pay the required fee; renew annually, on a transfer of model ownership or on a material change.Applies when: Developing, deploying or operating a frontier model in whole or in part in Illinois. The statement identifies the developer, its offices, listed owners and three points of contact. | Every year | Public Act 104-0538, Section 18(a)-(c) |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Frontier developer | Do not use rules, policies or contracts to prevent, or retaliate against, a covered employee's protected disclosures; give covered employees notice of their rights.Applies when: A covered employee reasonably believes information shows a specific and substantial danger from catastrophic risk or a violation of the Act. Notice is by continuous posting or yearly written notice. | Ongoing | Public Act 104-0538, Section 20(a), (b), (d) |
| January 1, 2027 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Provide an anonymous internal reporting process, update the discloser monthly, and share disclosures and responses with officers and directors at least quarterly.Applies when: Covered employee disclosures. Matters alleging wrongdoing by a particular officer or director are not shared with that person. | Ongoing | Public Act 104-0538, Section 20(e) |
Starting later 7 duties
Dates further out, in order.
| Starts | Law | Who | What it requires | How often | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Write, implement, comply with and publish on its website a frontier AI framework covering ten listed topics, including capability thresholds, mitigations, third-party assessment, model-weight cybersecurity and incident response.Applies when: A frontier developer whose annual gross revenues, with affiliates, exceeded $500,000,000 in the preceding calendar year. | Ongoing | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(a) |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Review and update the framework at least once a year, and publish any materially modified framework with a justification within 30 days.Applies when: A framework is in place; the 30-day clock runs from a material modification. | Every year | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(b) |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Retain an independent third party each year to audit compliance with Section 10, with no financial interest between them and no payment tied to results.Applies when: Beginning January 1, 2028, or 90 days after first becoming a large frontier developer, whichever is later. | Every year | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(d) |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114) | Health care payor | Do not use any policy, algorithm or automated tool that bypasses evaluation of the billing professional's information to downcode a claim.Applies when: Any claim. An automated process may flag claims that may justify downcoding under CPT guidelines. | Ongoing | Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 15(a), (b) |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114) | Health care payor | Have a natural person make or review every downcoding determination under CPT guidelines, considering the information the billing professional submitted.Applies when: Every downcoding determination; the payor must keep written policies requiring this. | Ongoing | Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 15(b) |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114) | Health care payor | Do not downcode a claim based solely on reported diagnosis codes, or target professionals who routinely treat complex or chronic conditions.Applies when: Any claim. | Ongoing | Transparency in Downcoding Act, Sections 20 and 35 |
| January 1, 2028 | Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114) | Health care payor | Offer a dispute process allowing at least 90 days to file, reviewed by a qualified natural person not involved in the original decision.Applies when: All downcoded claims. | Ongoing | Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 30 |
Triggered by an event 9 duties
These apply when something happens, such as a request, an incident or a decision about a person. Each row says what triggers it.
| Starts | Law | Who | What it requires | How often | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When triggered | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Large frontier developer | Within 30 days of receiving the audit report, publish a summary and redacted report and send the redacted report to the Agency and Attorney General.Applies when: Each annual audit. The unredacted report must be kept for as long as the frontier model is deployed plus 5 years. | Every year | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(d)(3), (4) |
| When triggered | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Frontier developer | Report each critical safety incident to the Agency and the Attorney General within 72 hours.Applies when: The developer reasonably believes a critical safety incident occurred. If it poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury, an appropriate authority must be told within 24 hours. | Each time it happens | Public Act 104-0538, Section 15(c) |
| When triggered | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act | Frontier developer | When redacting a published document, describe the character and justification of each redaction and keep the unredacted information for 5 years.Applies when: Redactions made to protect trade secrets, cybersecurity, public safety or national security, or to comply with law. | Each time it happens | Public Act 104-0538, Section 10(g) |
| When triggered | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Employer | Delete the applicant's interviews within 30 days after receiving the request, and instruct anyone who received copies to delete them, including electronically generated backup copies.Applies when: An applicant asks for deletion. | Each time it happens | 820 ILCS 42/15 |
| When triggered | Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act | Person who received copies of an applicant's video interview | Comply with the employer's instructions to delete the applicant's video interviews.Applies when: The employer passes on a deletion instruction after an applicant's request. | Each time it happens | 820 ILCS 42/15 |
| When triggered | Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875) | Person that solely transmits, stores or provides access to data or software | On gaining knowledge or written notice of claimed unauthorized activity, act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material, or expeditiously notify the party able to do so.Applies when: On an event: actual knowledge, awareness of facts creating it, or written notice of an unauthorized digital replica stored or transmitted at a user's direction. Meeting a Section 30(e) condition keeps the host outside facilitation liability. | Each time it happens | 765 ILCS 1075/30(e)(3), (f) |
| When triggered | Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114) | Health care payor | Notify the billing professional with CARCs and RARCs, giving the specific reason, original and revised codes and payments, and how to dispute.Applies when: Whenever a claim is downcoded. | Each time it happens | Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 25 |
| When triggered | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Licensed professional | Before using AI for supplementary support, tell the patient or representative in writing that AI will be used and its specific purpose, and get their consent.Applies when: The client's therapeutic session is recorded or transcribed. Notice and consent may come from the patient's legally authorized representative. | Ongoing | P.A. 104-0054 § 15(b) |
| When triggered | Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806) | Individual, corporation, or entity found in violation | Pay any civil penalty within 60 days after the date of the Department order imposing it.Applies when: The Department has imposed a civil penalty after a hearing. The order is a judgment and may be filed and executed like a court judgment. | Each time it happens | P.A. 104-0054 § 30(a) |
Law by law
Who each law covers, who enforces it, the penalties, whether people can sue and what the text leaves open. Open a law to see it; every line cites its section.
Illinois AI smart glasses while driving (HB 4843)
1 duty · checked November 15, 2026
Public Act 104-0682 (HB 4843), § 5 amending 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Driver. A person operating a motor vehicle on an Illinois roadway. 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(b)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Traffic enforcement; a violation is an offense against traffic regulations governing the movement of vehicles.
- Penalty: Fine up to $75 (first offense), $100 (second), $125 (third), $150 (fourth or later), using an electronic communication device while driving. 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(c)
- Penalty: Minimum fine of $1,000; Class A misdemeanor for great bodily harm, permanent disability or disfigurement; Class 4 felony for death, aggravated use: a violation that proximately causes a crash with great bodily harm, permanent disability, disfigurement or death. 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(b-5), (c), (e)
- Can people sue? The law does not say 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2
- Time to fix before enforcement: None
Exemptions
- Law enforcement and emergency vehicle operators on duty; first responders en route; drivers reporting an emergency; drivers parked on the shoulder. 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(d)(1)-(2), (5)
- The hands-free or voice-operated exemption and the stopped-in-traffic exemption do not apply to AI smart glasses. 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2(d)(3), (6)
What the text leaves open
- Sentence ranges for the Class A misdemeanor and Class 4 felony are set in the Unified Code of Corrections, which was not read.
Illinois AI video interview demographic reporting (Section 20 of the Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act)
2 duties · checked November 14, 2026
Public Act 102-0047 (HB 53, 102nd General Assembly), approved July 9, 2021; adds 820 ILCS 42/20. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Employer. An employer that relies solely upon an artificial intelligence analysis of a video interview to determine whether an applicant will be selected for an in-person interview. 820 ILCS 42/20(a) (P.A. 102-0047, Sec. 5)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: The law does not name one
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say P.A. 102-0047 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Employers that do not rely solely on an AI analysis of a video interview to decide who gets an in-person interview are outside Section 20. 820 ILCS 42/20(a)
What the text leaves open
- The Public Act page, as returned by the reader on two reads, showed Section 20 subsections (a) and (b) only. Whether Section 20 also requires the Department to analyze the data and report to the Governor and General Assembly, and by what date, could not be confirmed because the compiled statute could not be opened.
- The text does not say when the first annual report is due or what form the report takes.
- Whether any later Public Act amended 820 ILCS 42/20 was not checked.
Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act
13 duties · checked November 14, 2026
Public Act 104-0538 (SB 315, 104th General Assembly), Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act; also amends Section 7.5 of the Freedom of Information Act and Section 15 of the Whistleblower Act. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Frontier developer. A person that trains, or initiates the training of, a frontier model: a foundation model trained with more computing than the stated threshold, counting later fine-tuning and other material modifications. Threshold: More than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations used in training (the reader showed the figure as 1026, a lost superscript). Public Act 104-0538, Section 5 (frontier developer; frontier model)
- Large frontier developer. A frontier developer that, together with its affiliates, passed the revenue threshold in the preceding calendar year. Threshold: Annual gross revenues above $500,000,000, counted with affiliates, in the preceding calendar year. Public Act 104-0538, Section 5 (large frontier developer)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Attorney General, who alone may bring the civil action for penalties. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security receives filings and reports and, after notice and hearing, may impose the disclosure-statement penalties.
- Penalty: Up to $1,000,000 for a first violation and up to $3,000,000 for each later violation, set by severity, a large frontier developer that fails to publish or send a required compliant document, makes a prohibited statement, fails to complete a required audit, fails to report an incident or fails to follow its own framework. Public Act 104-0538, Section 25(a), (b)
- Penalty: $1,000 per day, plus an amount equal to any unpaid assessment, a large frontier developer operating without a current disclosure statement, failing to file or correct false information, or failing to pay Agency fees, imposed by the Agency after notice and hearing. Public Act 104-0538, Section 18(e)
- Can people sue? No Public Act 104-0538, Section 25(d)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Not catastrophic risk: output that is publicly accessible in substantially similar form from another source, lawful federal government activity, and harm from other software where the frontier model did not materially contribute. Public Act 104-0538, Section 5 (catastrophic risk)
- Making a frontier model available primarily for research, development or evaluation is not deploying it. Public Act 104-0538, Section 5 (deploy)
- Reporting on foundation models that are not frontier models is voluntary. Public Act 104-0538, Section 15(c)
- The Act has no exemption section for small developers or federal contractors; the compute and revenue thresholds are the only general limits. Public Act 104-0538, Section 5
What the text leaves open
- Section 25(a) as read names only large frontier developers. The text does not state a civil penalty for a frontier developer that is not large and misses a duty such as incident reporting.
- Section 15(f)(5) refers to a covered employee report made under Section 30, but Section 30 covers cumulative duties and the whistleblower provisions are in Section 20.
- Remedies under the amended Whistleblower Act were not read.
- The compiled-statute (ILCS) citation was not shown in the Public Act text read.
- Court challenges and any federal action against this law were not checked in this run.
Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act
7 duties · checked November 14, 2026
Public Act 101-0260 (HB 2557, 101st General Assembly), approved August 9, 2019; 820 ILCS 42/1 to 42/15; Section 20 added by Public Act 102-0047. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Employer. An employer that asks applicants to record video interviews and uses an artificial intelligence analysis of the videos, when considering applicants for positions based in Illinois. The Act does not define employer. 820 ILCS 42/5 (P.A. 101-0260, Sec. 5)
- Person who received copies of an applicant's video interview. Any other person who received copies of an applicant's video interviews from the employer. 820 ILCS 42/15 (P.A. 101-0260, Sec. 15)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: The law does not name one
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say P.A. 101-0260 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Section 5 applies only when considering applicants for positions based in Illinois. 820 ILCS 42/5 (P.A. 101-0260, Sec. 5)
- Videos may be shared with persons whose expertise or technology is necessary to evaluate an applicant's fitness for a position. 820 ILCS 42/10 (P.A. 101-0260, Sec. 10)
What the text leaves open
- The Act defines none of its terms, including employer, applicant and artificial intelligence, and states no penalty, enforcer or private right of action.
- The compiled statute pages for 820 ILCS 42 could not be opened in this run, so whether any Public Act after 102-0047 amended the Act was not checked.
- The Public Act 102-0047 page, as returned by the reader, showed Section 20 subsections (a) and (b) only. Whether Section 20 also has a subsection on the Department analyzing the data and reporting to the Governor and General Assembly could not be confirmed.
Illinois Health Care Protection Act, utilization review provision (HB 5395)
1 duty · checked November 11, 2026
Public Act 103-0650 (HB 5395, Health Care Protection Act), effective January 1, 2025; amends 215 ILCS 134/85(e)(2) among many other sections. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Utilization review program. A person conducting a utilization review program in Illinois. 215 ILCS 134/85(a), (e)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Department of Insurance.
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say 215 ILCS 134/85 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Programs serving only the federal government; self-insured ERISA plans themselves (but not persons doing utilization review for them); hospitals and medical groups reviewing for internal purposes. 215 ILCS 134/85(c)
What the text leaves open
- Public Act 103-0656 (HB 2472) amended the same section on the same date and adds the accreditation and physician-oversight duties; see that law's page.
- Penalty amounts under the Illinois Insurance Code were not read.
Illinois Human Rights Act AI-in-employment amendment (Public Act 103-0804)
3 duties · checked November 11, 2026
Public Act 103-0804, amending 775 ILCS 5/2-101 and 5/2-102 (adding 2-101(M), (N) and 2-102(L)). Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Employer. An employer under the Illinois Human Rights Act, which includes any person employing one or more employees in Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks in the year of or the year before the alleged violation, the State and its political subdivisions, parties to public contracts, and joint apprenticeship or training committees. Threshold: one or more employees within Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks (existing definition; the Act adds no separate threshold for the AI provision) 775 ILCS 5/2-101(B)(1); 5/2-102(L)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Department of Human Rights (the Act makes the conduct a civil rights violation under the Human Rights Act; the Act's existing charge, investigation and Human Rights Commission or circuit court remedies apply and were not re-read today).
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say 775 ILCS 5/2-102(L) (the amendment itself is silent; the Human Rights Act's general civil-action provisions were not re-read today)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
What the text leaves open
- 2-102(L) says employers must notify 'an employee'; it does not use the word 'applicant', though the covered purposes include recruitment and hiring. The proposed rules would extend notice to prospective employees, but they were not final on November 11, 2026.
- Whether the general Human Rights Act remedies (charge with the Department, Human Rights Commission, circuit court action after exhaustion) apply unchanged was not re-read from 775 ILCS 5/7A and 5/10 today.
- SB 3364 (104th General Assembly) would extend AI notice duties to real estate, credit and public accommodations; as of the ILGA status page it had not passed.
Illinois Right of Publicity Act digital replica amendments (HB 4875)
4 duties · checked November 14, 2026
Public Act 103-0836 (HB 4875), effective January 1, 2025; amends Right of Publicity Act, 765 ILCS 1075/5, 1075/20, 1075/30 and 1075/35. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Person. A natural or juristic person. For the digital replica rules in Section 30(b) and (d), a service provider (broadband, wireless or telecommunications carrier) counts only if it created the unauthorized digital replica, and a data center does not count. 765 ILCS 1075/5 (definition of person)
- Person that solely transmits, stores or provides access to data or software. Hosts and intermediaries, including interactive entertainment software, application software providers and cloud service providers, handling material stored or transmitted at a user's direction. They are outside facilitation liability if they meet the Section 30(e) conditions. 765 ILCS 1075/30(e)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Private civil action by the individual or authorized representative, a written transferee of the rights, or after death a person with an interest in them; for a recording artist, also the holder of an exclusive personal-services contract or exclusive distribution license. No government enforcer is named.
- Penalty: The greater of (1) actual damages, profits from the unauthorized use, or both, or (2) $1,000, violating Section 30 of the Right of Publicity Act. 765 ILCS 1075/40(a)
- Penalty: Punitive damages, amount not stated, willful violation of Section 30. 765 ILCS 1075/40(b)
- Penalty: Temporary restraining orders and injunctions; reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses to the prevailing party, court remedies in an action under the Act. 765 ILCS 1075/50; 1075/55
- Can people sue? Yes 765 ILCS 1075/20(a), (a-5) (who may enforce the rights and remedies)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- News, public affairs, sports broadcasts or accounts, and political campaigns. 765 ILCS 1075/35(c)(1)
- Uses with political, public-interest, educational or newsworthy value, unless an audiovisual replica is intended to create, and does create, a false impression that it is an authentic recording the individual took part in. 765 ILCS 1075/35(c)(2)
- Documentaries, docudramas, historical or biographical works and other depictions of the individual, regardless of fictionalization, unless they create a false impression that the replica is authentic or that the individual participated. 765 ILCS 1075/35(c)(3)
- Comment, criticism, scholarship, satire or parody, and promotional materials for the exempt uses. 765 ILCS 1075/35(c)(4), (5)
- A data center is not a person for Section 30(b) and (d); a service provider is one only if it created the unauthorized digital replica. 765 ILCS 1075/5 (definition of person)
- The Act may not be construed inconsistently with 47 U.S.C. 230 or other federal law. 765 ILCS 1075/30(g)
What the text leaves open
- Sections 40 to 60 (damages, injunctions, fees) were read from an ilga.gov statute page whose Section 30 still shows the pre-2025 wording; whether any later Public Act changed the damages sections was not confirmed.
- The three Section 30(e) conditions are joined by 'or' in the text as read, which would let a host qualify by meeting any one of them.
- The lead-in to Section 35(b) could not be read cleanly: the page showed both old and new wording about which Section 30 subsections the older exemption list applies to.
- The Governor's approval date was not confirmed because the bill status page refused automated requests.
- Section 30(c) applies to individuals who died after the Act's effective date; the text read does not say whether that means 1999 or 2025 for digital replicas.
Illinois Transparency in Downcoding Act (SB 3114)
5 duties · checked November 11, 2026
Public Act 104-0568 (SB 3114), Transparency in Downcoding Act; adds 305 ILCS 5/5-5.12g. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Health care payor. A group health plan sponsor, health insurance issuer or Medicaid managed care organization, for covered policies and plans issued, amended, delivered or renewed on or after the effective date. Transparency in Downcoding Act, Sections 5 and 10(a)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Department of Insurance, using its powers under the Insurance Code; the Department of Healthcare and Family Services for Medicaid managed care organizations. Payors are responsible for delegated third parties.
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 40 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: None
Exemptions
- Self-insured ERISA plans, workers' compensation and occupational disease care, and excepted benefits such as stand-alone dental plans. Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 10(a)
- Combining multiple codes into one group code as federal and State program integrity rules require is not downcoding. Transparency in Downcoding Act, Section 5
What the text leaves open
- Penalty amounts available to the Department of Insurance under the Insurance Code were not read.
- The Department may not decide individual coding disputes in a binding way, but may investigate complaints about the natural-person review rule (Section 40(a)).
- Regulation of downcoding is reserved to the State; home rule units may not regulate it (Section 10(d)).
Illinois Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act (HB 1806)
6 duties · checked November 12, 2026
Public Act 104-0054 (HB 1806, 104th General Assembly), approved and effective August 1, 2025; 225 ILCS 155/1 et seq.. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Individual, corporation, or entity. Anyone that provides, advertises or otherwise offers therapy or psychotherapy services to the public in Illinois, including through Internet-based artificial intelligence. P.A. 104-0054 § 20(a) (225 ILCS 155/20(a))
- Licensed professional. An individual with a valid Illinois license to provide therapy or psychotherapy services: clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, social workers, professional counselors, clinical professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, authorized certified alcohol and other drug counselors, professional music therapists, advanced practice psychiatric nurses, and other state-authorized professionals except physicians. P.A. 104-0054 § 10 (225 ILCS 155/10)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, which may investigate actual, alleged or suspected violations and assesses penalties after a hearing under Section 2105-100 of the Department of Professional Regulation Law. No court order blocking the Act was looked for in this review.
- Penalty: Up to $10,000 per violation, any violation of the Act by an individual, corporation or entity, as determined by the Department based on the degree of harm and the circumstances of the violation. P.A. 104-0054 § 30(a) (225 ILCS 155/30(a))
- Can people sue? The law does not say P.A. 104-0054 § 30 (Department enforcement only; no provision creates or denies a private action)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Religious counseling: explicitly faith-based counseling by clergy, pastoral counselors or other religious leaders that is not represented as clinical mental health, therapy or psychotherapy services. P.A. 104-0054 §§ 10, 35(1)
- Peer support: services by people with lived experience of mental health conditions or recovery from substance use, without clinical intervention. P.A. 104-0054 §§ 10, 35(2)
- Self-help materials and educational resources that are available to the public and do not purport to offer therapy or psychotherapy services. P.A. 104-0054 § 35(3)
What the text leaves open
- The Act gives the Department no express rulemaking authority; whether the Department has issued rules or guidance under other authority was not checked.
- The definition of artificial intelligence is borrowed from Section 2-101 of the Illinois Human Rights Act, which was not opened.
- Physicians are left out of the catch-all in the licensed professional definition; how the Act applies to psychiatrists is not stated.
- Administrative support is defined as tasks that do not involve communication, while supplementary support refers to therapeutic communication; the Act does not explain the difference.
- Amendments after P.A. 104-0054 were not ruled out: the compiled-statutes index credits the Act to P.A. 104-54 only, but the section-level compiled text could not be opened.
- Whether any lawsuit challenges the Act was not checked.
Illinois civil remedy for sharing digitally altered sexual images (HB 2123)
1 duty · checked November 15, 2026
Public Act 103-0294 (HB 2123), amending the Civil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act, 740 ILCS 190/5, 10, 15 and 25. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Person. Any person over 18, which the Act defines to include individuals, businesses, nonprofits and government bodies. Threshold: over the age of 18 740 ILCS 190/5(11); 190/10(a)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: The person shown, by a civil lawsuit. A web search on November 15, 2026 found no court challenge.
- Penalty: The greater of actual damages (including emotional distress) or statutory damages up to $10,000 per defendant, plus the defendant's monetary gain and punitive damages, a successful civil claim. 740 ILCS 190/25(a)
- Penalty: Attorney's fees and costs; injunctions ordering the image taken down, relief the court may add for a prevailing plaintiff. 740 ILCS 190/25(b)
- Can people sue? Yes 740 ILCS 190/10(a)
- Time to fix before enforcement: None
Exemptions
- Good-faith sharing by law enforcement, in a legal proceeding, or for medical education or treatment; good-faith reporting or investigation of unlawful or unwelcome conduct; matters of public concern. 740 ILCS 190/15(a)
What the text leaves open
- HB 2123 deleted the Act's sentence saying it imposes no liability on interactive computer services for others' content; federal 47 U.S.C. 230 still applies on its own terms.
Illinois crimes for AI-generated child sexual imagery and sexually explicit digitized depictions (HB 4623)
2 duties · checked November 15, 2026
Public Act 103-0825 (HB 4623), creating 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4 and 5/11-23.7 and amending 5/11-20.1. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Person. Anyone who receives, shares or possesses the covered images, including a business that makes or distributes them. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(b); 5/11-23.7(b)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Criminal prosecution; the sections do not name the prosecuting office. A web search on November 15, 2026 found no court challenge.
- Penalty: Class 3 felony (Class 2 for a second or later offense), receiving or accessing an obscene depiction of a purported child. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(c)
- Penalty: Class 1 felony (Class X for a second or later offense), reproducing, sharing, exhibiting or possessing to share such a depiction. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(c)
- Penalty: Receiving or accessing: Class 2 felony (Class 1 for a repeat offense). Sharing: Class X felony (Class X with at least 9 years in prison for a repeat offense), depictions indistinguishable from an actual child under 13. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(d)
- Penalty: Class 4 felony, non-consensual sharing of a sexually explicit digitized depiction. 720 ILCS 5/11-23.7(f)
- Penalty: Forfeiture under Article 124B of the Code of Criminal Procedure, any conviction under either section. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(f); 5/11-23.7(e)
- Can people sue? The law does not say 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4 and 11-23.7 (criminal offenses only)
- Time to fix before enforcement: None
Exemptions
- Interactive computer services, mobile or radio service providers, and telecommunications or broadband providers, solely for content provided by another person. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4(e); 5/11-23.7(d)
- For digitized depictions: sharing for a lawful criminal investigation, to report unlawful conduct, for a lawful public purpose, or where the images involve voluntary exposure in public or commercial settings. 720 ILCS 5/11-23.7(c)
What the text leaves open
- Prison and fine ranges for each felony class are set in the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5), which was not opened.
Illinois digital replica contract law (HB 3178)
1 duty · checked November 14, 2026
Public Act 104-0282 (HB 3178), effective January 1, 2026; amends 815 ILCS 550/10 (Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act). Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Party contracting for an individual's services. Any person with an agreement for an individual's personal or professional services that lets a digital replica of the individual's voice or likeness replace in-person work. 815 ILCS 550/10(a)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: The law does not name one
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say 815 ILCS 550/10 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: None
Exemptions
- Individuals represented by legal counsel who negotiated the replica license, with licensing terms in a written agreement. 815 ILCS 550/10(a)(3)(A)
- Individuals represented by a labor union whose collective bargaining agreement expressly covers digital replica uses. 815 ILCS 550/10(a)(3)(B)
- A missing use description does not void the provision when the replica's uses fit the services contract and the fundamental character of the recorded work. 815 ILCS 550/10(b)
What the text leaves open
- The section does not say what counts as a reasonably specific description.
- Before this act, the rule covered existing performances too; the act limits it to new performances fixed on or after January 1, 2026.
Illinois utilization review automated process law (HB 2472)
4 duties · checked November 11, 2026
Public Act 103-0656 (HB 2472), effective January 1, 2025; amends 215 ILCS 134/10, 134/45 and 134/85 (Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act) among others. Official text · Full law page
Who it covers
- Utilization review program. A person conducting a utilization review program in Illinois, including a health care plan, that uses an algorithmic automated process to decide whether to make adverse medical-necessity determinations. 215 ILCS 134/85(a), (b-10)
Enforcement
- Enforcer: Illinois Department of Insurance.
- Penalty: the law does not set an amount.
- Can people sue? The law does not say 215 ILCS 134/85 (silent)
- Time to fix before enforcement: The law does not say
Exemptions
- Programs serving only the federal government; self-insured ERISA plans themselves (but not persons doing utilization review for them); hospitals and medical groups reviewing for internal purposes. 215 ILCS 134/85(c)
What the text leaves open
- Penalty amounts under the Illinois Insurance Code for violating the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act were not read.
- The section does not define algorithmic automated process.
Other enacted laws to check
These 12 enacted AI laws are in the states you chose, but they are not yet mapped duty by duty, so they are not in the plan above. Each page has a summary and the official source.
- Illinois HB1859: COM COL-COURSE INSTRUCTOR-AI (effective January 1, 2026)
- Illinois HB2949: FY27 BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
- Illinois HB3563: DOIT-AI TASK FORCE (effective August 4, 2023)
- Illinois HB3851: SCH CD-CYBER-BULLYING (effective July 1, 2026)
- Illinois HB3902: STATE GOVT-GENERAL MANDATES (effective June 16, 2023)
- Illinois HB4762: DIGITAL LIKENESS PROTECTION (effective August 9, 2024)
- Illinois SB 2909: SCH CD-TEACHER EVALUATION-AI (effective January 1, 2027)
- Illinois SB0225: SOS-FACIAL RECOGNITION INFO (effective August 13, 2021)
- Illinois SB1507: VEH CD-SAFETY ZONES (effective January 1, 2026)
- Illinois SB1920: SCH CD-ASL IMPLEMENTATION (effective January 1, 2026)
- Illinois SB2655: MEDICAID EXPANSION TASK FORCE (effective March 21, 2025)
- Illinois SB382: CIVIL LAW-TECH (effective December 8, 2023)
Information, not legal advice. This plan summarizes what the official texts of the laws listed say. It does not decide whether a law applies to your organization; that turns on facts such as your size, your role as a developer or deployer, and how you use AI. Laws change, and courts and regulators can read them differently. Check the official text linked with each duty and talk to a qualified lawyer before acting. Using this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. See our terms of service.
How the plan is built
Each law in the plan was read from its official text, on the legislature’s or state’s own website. 265 of the 326 have also been read a second time to confirm every date, threshold, penalty and enforcer; the rest have had one full read, and each shows the date it was last checked. Each duty is written in plain English in 30 words or fewer and carries the section it comes from, with a link.
Where a law is silent, the plan says so. It does not borrow a penalty from another statute or guess at a deadline. A law that is repealed or replaced on a known date shows that end date, and its duties leave the plan once the date passes. The date each law was last checked appears with it.
The plan is built fresh from these records every time the page loads, so it changes as soon as a law is added or re-checked. To report an error, use the corrections page. For how we find laws and decide what counts as an AI law, see our methodology. If you are not sure which laws touch your business at all, start with Am I Affected?
Common questions
What does an AI compliance plan cover?
Each duty an enacted state AI law places on a business or other regulated party: who it applies to, what it requires, when it starts, how often it recurs, who enforces it, the penalties and whether people can sue. The builder covers 1,235 duties in 326 enacted laws across 50 states, and every duty links to the section of law it comes from.
Where does the information come from?
From the official text of each law: the enrolled bill, session law or codified statute, opened on the legislature's or state's own website. 265 of the 326 laws have also been read a second time to confirm every date, threshold, penalty and enforcer, and the date each law was last checked is shown with it. Where a law is silent on a point, such as a penalty amount, the plan says the law does not say rather than filling the gap. Law firm summaries and news reports are never used as sources.
Does the plan include every AI law in a state?
Not yet. It includes the enacted laws we have mapped duty by duty. When you choose a state, its other enacted AI laws are listed separately with links, so nothing is left out of view. New laws are added as they are read. When a law is repealed or replaced on a set date, its duties show that end date and leave the plan once it passes.
How do I know which duties apply to my company?
Start with the 'who it covers' entry for each law: many apply only above a size or revenue threshold, only to developers or only to deployers, or only in one industry. The plan quotes those conditions from the text. Whether your company meets them depends on facts only you and your counsel know.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is information drawn from official legal texts, organized so you can see what each law requires. Use it to brief your team and your lawyers, not in place of them.
What does Pro add?
The same plan as a CSV file for spreadsheets and audit files, and as a calendar file (.ics) with every dated duty as an event that links back to the law. Both are built from the states and uses you pick. The plan on this page, and printing it, are open to everyone.