Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
HB1607 aims to regulate algorithmic decision-making in Hawaii by prohibiting discriminatory practices and requiring transparency through notifications and annual reporting. Businesses utilizing such technologies will need to comply with these new requirements to avoid civil enforcement actions.
Requires notifications to individuals whose personal information is used.
Mandates annual reports to the Department of the Attorney General.
Establishes civil enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance.
Latest Legislative Action
Referred to HET/JHA, referral sheet 1
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 30)
Name
Role
AMATO
Primary
BELATTI
Primary
COCHRAN
Primary
EVSLIN
Primary
GANADEN
Primary
HUSSEY
Primary
ICHIYAMA
Primary
ILAGAN
Primary
KAPELA
Primary
KEOHOKAPU-LEE LOY
Primary
KILA
Primary
LUKE
Primary
MARTEN
Primary
MARTINEZ
Primary
MATAYOSHI
Primary
MATSUMOTO
Primary
MIYAKE
Primary
MORIKAWA
Primary
MURAOKA
Primary
NAKAMURA
Primary
NAKASHIMA
Primary
PERRUSO
Primary
PIERICK
Primary
POEPOE
Primary
REYES ODA
Primary
SHIMIZU
Primary
TAKAYAMA
Primary
TAKUMI
Primary
TAM
Primary
TARNAS
Primary
Compliance Checklist
Notify individuals whose personal information is used in algorithmic decision-making. Who: Users of algorithmic decision-making. Penalty: Civil enforcement actions.
Submit annual reports to the Department of the Attorney General. Who: Users of algorithmic decision-making. Deadline: Annually. Penalty: Civil enforcement actions.
HB1607 establishes a framework to prevent algorithmic discrimination by prohibiting users of algorithmic decision-making from making eligibility determinations in a discriminatory manner. It requires these users to provide notices to individuals whose personal information is utilized in such processes. Furthermore, the bill mandates the submission of annual reports to the Department of the Attorney General, ensuring oversight and accountability in the use of algorithmic systems. The bill also outlines civil enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance, emphasizing the importance of adherence to these regulations. This legislation reflects a growing trend in various states to address the ethical implications of AI and algorithmic decision-making, aligning with similar laws aimed at promoting fairness and transparency in technology use.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.