In one paragraph
Maryland's HB 1250 (2026, first reader text, cross-filed with SB 827) would have regulated operators and developers of generative AI chatbots made available to Maryland users: affirmative consent for training on input data, a ban on using chat logs for advertising, a 10-year cap on chat log retention, protections for users under 13, hourly not-human warnings, monthly safety testing, and product liability with possible strict liability. It had a House Economic Matters hearing set for March 3, 2026 and died when the 2026 session ended.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
None: the bill died and did not become law. It would have set consent, data, warning and testing duties for chatbot operators and developers and exposed them to product liability.
Key provisions
- Would have added Commercial Law Title 14, Subtitle 51 (sections 14-5101 to 14-5112; short title "Curbing Harmful AI Technology Act") and listed violations as unfair, abusive or deceptive trade practices under Title 13
- Chatbot: a generative AI system with a natural-language interface giving adaptive responses; operator: any person, including a developer, that makes a chatbot available to a user in Maryland
- Operators could not make available a chatbot capable of training on input data without affirmative consent, using chat logs for advertising decisions, profiling users beyond what a prompt needs, keeping chat logs more than 10 years unless required by law, or giving financial, legal or medical advice in violation of licensing law
- If an operator or developer knows or should know a user is under 13, no training on input data or processing of other personal data without written parental consent
- Persistent on-screen warning that the chatbot is artificial and not human, plus pop-up warnings requiring a response at the start, after each hour of continuous use, and when a user asks how it works; monthly safety testing with published findings
- Users could inspect and download their chat logs; operators could not sell chat logs or retaliate against users who refuse consent
- A chatbot is treated as a product with an affirmative duty not to harm users and possible strict liability; individuals could sue for injunction, declaratory relief or damages, with punitive damages up to three times actual damages for knowing violations; the Attorney General could seek declaratory relief
- Would have taken effect October 1, 2026
Latest legislative action
Feb 18, 2026. Hearing 3/03 at 1:00 p.m.; died when the Maryland General Assembly's 2026 session ended April 13, 2026
Sponsors (showing 5 of 34)
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Adams | Primary |
| Allen | Primary |
| Arikan | Primary |
| Baker | Primary |
| Ciliberti | Primary |
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error