Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A03125: Relates to the use of automated decision tools by landlords for making housing decisions; sets conditions and rules for use of such tools.

In Committee New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

A03125 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

New York's A 3125-A would add Real Property Law § 227-g making it unlawful for a landlord to use an automated housing decision making tool to screen applicants unless a disparate impact analysis by an independent auditor is done at least annually and a summary is posted on the landlord's website before use. Applicants would have to get notice at least 24 hours before use and may request an alternative process. The Attorney General could investigate and sue. Would take effect immediately. Ordered to third reading (calendar 103) in the Assembly January 7, 2026; it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, landlords using AI or algorithmic tools to screen rental applicants would need annual independent bias audits, public posting of audit summaries, and 24-hour advance notice to applicants.

Key provisions

  1. Adds Real Property Law § 227-g; covers software using algorithms, computational models or AI to materially automate, substantially assist or replace human decision-making in screening housing applicants
  2. Landlords may not use such a tool unless a disparate impact analysis (impartial, by an independent auditor) is conducted "no less than annually" and provided to the landlord
  3. A summary of the most recent analysis and the tool's distribution date must be posted on the landlord's website before use and be accessible through any digital listing where the tool is used
  4. Applicants must be told the tool will be used, the characteristics it uses, the data collected, source and retention policy, and the reason for any denial, at least 24 hours before use, with a right to request an alternative selection process or accommodation
  5. Attorney General may investigate and sue for compliance or other appropriate relief; the text sets no dollar penalties and no private right of action
  6. Would take effect immediately; amended May 16, 2025 (3125-A) and ordered to third reading (cal.103) January 7, 2026

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2026. ordered to third reading cal.103

Sponsors (showing 5 of 21)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error