Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A09601: Prohibits the use of automated systems to make employment decisions unless there is a meaningful human review of the output of such automated system …

In Committee New York

Last verified Oct 15, 2026 · official bill text

A09601 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Prohibits the use of automated systems to make employment decisions unless there is a meaningful human review of the output of such automated system prior to the final employment decision; requires employers that use an automated system in the hiring process to notify applicants of the use of such…

In one paragraph

New York's A 9601 would add Labor Law § 211-b barring an employer from using an automated system (including an automated employment decision tool, algorithm or AI system) to screen resumes or applicants unless there is “meaningful human review” of its output before any final or adverse employment decision, and barring denial of employment solely on an automated system's action. Employers would have to notify applicants; applicants could request human review of an adverse decision. Referred to the Labor Committee January 21, 2026; it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, employers using automated tools to screen applicants would need human review before final or adverse decisions, applicant notices and human review on request.

Key provisions

  1. Automated recommendations, scores, rankings or filters must be subject to human evaluation and “override authority”
  2. Employers using an automated system in hiring must notify applicants, describe in plain language the type of data analyzed, and describe the human reviewer's role in the final decision
  3. An applicant with an adverse decision involving an automated system is entitled to a human-conducted review on request
  4. “Meaningful human review” means a deliberate evaluation by a human with decision-making authority to modify or overturn the outcome
  5. The Commissioner may issue administrative fines and cease-and-desist orders and require corrective action (no amounts stated); no private right of action
  6. Would take effect immediately; referred to Labor January 21, 2026, with no further action

Latest legislative action

Jan 21, 2026. referred to labor

Sponsors (showing 5 of 28)

NameRole
D Primary
D Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error