Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB 1248: State agencies: automated decision systems.

Dead/Failed California

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB 1248 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action May 14, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's SB 1248 (2025-26 Regular Session) would restrict how state agencies use automated decision systems to confer services such as professional licenses and public benefits. An agency could not use a system's output as the sole basis for an adverse service determination affecting a person, except as specified, and would have to verify accuracy and promote nondiscrimination. Held under submission in Senate Appropriations on May 14, 2026; not passed before the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have applied to state agencies' use of automated decision systems, not to private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Would add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 12898) to Part 2.5 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code
  2. Would prohibit a state agency from using an automated decision system output as the sole basis for an adverse service determination affecting a natural person, except as specified
  3. Would require the agency to verify the accuracy of the system's outputs and promote nondiscrimination in its use, as specified
  4. Would require the agency director or designee to provide quality control review of outputs to assure acceptable accuracy
  5. Would authorize GovOps to adopt and publish guidance, after notifying the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and require it to give technical assistance to agencies on request
  6. Held in Senate Appropriations on May 14, 2026; dead after the session ended

Latest legislative action

May 14, 2026. May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Sponsors

NameRole
Author

Roll call votes

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection] Mar 24, 2026

13 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error