Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MD HB756: Law Enforcement - Use of Facial Recognition Technology - Images Captured in Dwelling Interior

Dead/Failed Maryland · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB756 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 5, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Maryland's HB 756 (2026, first reader text) would have added an exception to Criminal Procedure section 2-503 letting law enforcement use facial recognition technology on still or video images captured by a camera inside a dwelling to investigate arson, burglary and trespass offenses. It had a House Judiciary hearing set for February 24, 2026 and died when the 2026 session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and did not become law. It would have widened the crimes for which police could use facial recognition on images from cameras inside a dwelling.

Key provisions

  1. Would have amended Criminal Procedure section 2-503: new paragraph (a)(2), with (a)(1) (the existing list of crimes and limits) beginning "Except as provided in paragraph (2)"
  2. Images captured by a camera inside a dwelling (a structure any part of which is adapted for overnight accommodation) could be used with facial recognition to investigate first- and second-degree arson, first-, third- and fourth-degree burglary, trespass on posted property and wanton trespass on private property
  3. Existing rules not changed by the bill include that facial recognition results may not be introduced as evidence in a criminal trial and must be independently verified by trained personnel
  4. Section 2-503(c)(2) amended so evidence from violations of (a)(1) or (a)(2) may be used for section 2-502 purposes if a legally valid exclusionary-rule exception applies
  5. The bill sets no separate penalty or enforcement mechanism; it would have taken effect October 1, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 5, 2026. Hearing 2/24 at 1:00 p.m.; died when the Maryland General Assembly's 2026 session ended April 13, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 54)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Roll call votes

On Third Reading Feb 27, 2025

137 yea0 nay4 otherPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error