Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN SF4233: Surveillance-based price and wage discrimination prohibition

Dead/Failed Minnesota

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SF4233 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 17, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Minnesota's SF 4233 would have prohibited using an automated decision system to set individualized prices for consumers or wages for workers based on surveillance data about them, with listed exceptions, and required anyone using such a system for prices or wages to publish procedures to check and correct the data. The text names no enforcer or penalty. Introduced March 9, 2026 and never left committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations for sellers or employers in Minnesota.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 325D.141; automated decision system means a computational system or process, including machine learning, statistics or AI techniques, whose result assists or replaces human decisions; surveillance data covers personal characteristics, behaviors and biometrics; companion HF 3794 (also died in committee)
  2. Surveillance-based price discrimination prohibited, except cost-justified price differences, publicly available group discounts offered on equal terms (e.g. military, veterans, teachers, students, seniors), insurers using only risk-relevant data, and credit decisions based on Fair Credit Reporting Act consumer reports
  3. Surveillance-based wage discrimination prohibited unless wages rest solely on task-related data about the worker or the worker's cost of providing labor, and the data and its use are disclosed in plain language before hiring; declining to hire a new person is not covered
  4. Anyone using an automated system to inform prices or wages must publish procedures to ensure data accuracy, let people correct or challenge data, and let them request what data is considered
  5. The text names no enforcer, penalties or private right of action; it would have taken effect August 1, 2026
  6. Introduced March 9, 2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection; no further action before the Legislature adjourned

Latest legislative action

Mar 17, 2026. Author added Boldon; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors (showing 5 of 18)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error