Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A03779: Restricts the use by an employer or an employment agency of electronic monitoring or an automated employment decision tool to screen a candidate or e…

Passed One Chamber New York · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 18, 2026 · official bill text

A03779 · where it stands

2 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Restricts the use by an employer or an employment agency of electronic monitoring or an automated employment decision tool to screen a candidate or employee for an employment decision unless such tool has been the subject of an impact assessment within the last year; requires notice to employment…

In one paragraph

New York's A 3779-A (the "boundaries on technology act") would add Labor Law Article 35-A: employers with 100 or more employees could not use an automated employment decision tool without an impact assessment by an impartial party within the prior year and yearly after; all employers using such tools would owe notice, meaningful human oversight and data access rights. The Labor Commissioner could assess penalties under Labor Law § 218 and the Attorney General could sue. Would take effect on the 180th day after becoming law. On the Assembly floor calendar since May 29, 2026; it has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, employers with 100+ employees would need yearly impartial impact assessments of automated employment decision tools, and any employer using such tools would owe notices and human oversight.

Key provisions

  1. Adds Labor Law Article 35-A (§§ 1010-1016) and amends § 218; unlawful for an employer with 100 or more employees to use an automated employment decision tool unless it has had an impact assessment no more than one year before use and each year after
  2. Assessment results go to the Department within sixty days for a public registry; if disparate impact is found the employer must refrain from using the tool until remedied
  3. Notice of tool use to employees and candidates, in each job posting and on the employer's website in English and the ten most common non-English languages
  4. Employers may not solely rely on tool output for hiring, promotion, termination, discipline or compensation and must keep meaningful human oversight
  5. Employees may request their data free; requests must be fulfilled within fourteen calendar days; adverse action within ninety days of a request or complaint is presumed retaliation
  6. Enforcement by the Commissioner (penalties under § 218, up to $1,000, $2,000, $3,000 for first, second, third or later violations for non-wage violations) and the Attorney General; no private right of action stated
  7. Would take effect on the 180th day after becoming law; Senate same-as S10147

Latest legislative action

May 29, 2026. ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.260

Sponsors (showing 5 of 26)

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-125
D Sponsor HD-106
R Sponsor HD-005
D Sponsor HD-050
D Sponsor HD-078

Roll call votes

A Assembly Codes Committee: Favorable refer to committee Rules Jun 5, 2025

20 yea1 nay1 otherPassed

A Assembly Labor Committee: Favorable refer to committee Codes May 28, 2025

28 yea1 nayPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error