Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MN HF4131: Surveillance-based price and wage discrimination prohibited.

Dead/Failed Minnesota

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HF4131 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 25, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law. Minnesota's HF 4131 would have added Minn. Stat. 325D.141 prohibiting surveillance-based price discrimination and wage discrimination, meaning use of an automated decision system to inform individualized prices or wages from surveillance data about a consumer or worker. Listed cost, group-discount and insurer risk exceptions would apply, and wage-setters would have to disclose the data and how the system uses it. The text has no penalties or enforcer. Introduced March 9, 2026; effective August 1, 2026 if enacted.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died, so it creates no obligations for Minnesota businesses that set prices or wages with automated systems.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Minn. Stat. 325D.141; automated decision system includes systems derived from machine learning, statistics, data processing or artificial-intelligence techniques
  2. Surveillance data: data obtained through observation, inference or surveillance of a consumer or worker about personal characteristics, behaviors or biometrics
  3. A person could not use such a system to inform individualized prices based on surveillance data, except for cost differences, discounts offered to all on equal terms, or insurers using only risk-relevant data
  4. A person could not use such a system to inform individualized wages based on surveillance data, unless wages rest solely on task-related data or cost differences and the data and system use are disclosed in plain language before hiring
  5. Anyone using such a system for wages or prices must publish procedures to ensure data accuracy, let people correct or challenge data, and let them request how the data is used
  6. The text contains no penalty, private right of action or enforcing agency; no companion bill
  7. Introduced March 9, 2026 and referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy; effective August 1, 2026 if enacted

Latest legislative action

Mar 25, 2026. Author added Pursell; no further action before the 2025-2026 Legislature adjourned

Sponsors (showing 5 of 12)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error